Table 1: Trade Values

What Cleveland is Offering

		G	MIN	FG	FGA	FG%	FT	FTA	FT%	OR	DR	TR	AST	STL	TO	BLK	PTS	PPG	Cred	AV
Nance	'88	67	2383	487	920	0.529	304	390	0.779	193	414	607	207	63	155	159	1280	19.1	1642	12.3
31	'89	73	2526	496	920	0.539	267	334	0.799	156	425	581	159	57	117	206	1259	17.2	1654	12.4
3.75	'90	62	2065	412	807	0.511	186	239	0.778	162	354	516	161	54	110	122	1011	16.3	1306	10.3
	Totals:	202	6974	1395	2647	0.527	757	963	0.786	511	1193	1704	527	174	382	487	3550	17.6	4602	11.3

		G	MIN	FG	FGA	FG%	FT	FTA	FT%	OR	DR	TR	AST	STL	TO	BLK	PTS	PPG	Cred	AV
Kerr	'88	Did	Not	Play
25	'89	26	157	20	46	0.435	6	9	0.667	3	14	17	24	7	6	0	54	2.1	67	1.1
8.25	'90	78	1664	192	432	0.444	63	73	0.863	12	86	98	248	45	74	7	520	6.7	594	5.7
	Totals:	104	2033	212	478	0.444	69	82	0.841	15	100	115	272	52	80	7	574	5.5	661	4.2

Nance's Trade Value:	28.6
Kerr's Trade Value:	25.3
Total Offered Trade Value:	53.9

What Cleveland Wants in Return

		G	MIN	FG	FGA	FG%	FT	FTA	FT%	OR	DR	TR	AST	STL	TO	BLK	PTS	PPG	Cred	AV
Chapman	'88	Did	Not	Play
23	'89	75	2219	526	1271	0.414	155	195	0.795	74	113	187	176	70	113	25	1267	16.9	827	7.3
9.75	'90	54	1762	377	924	0.408	144	192	0.750	52	127	179	132	46	100	6	945	17.5	613	5.9
	Totals:	129	4884	903	2195	0.411	299	387	0.773	126	240	366	308	116	213	31	2212	17.1	1440	6.4

Chapman's Trade Value:	50.6
Total Demanded Trade Value:	50.6

Cleveland is offering players whose total trade value is 53.9 for a player whose trade value is only 50.6. This would imply that this is a good trade for Charlotte. But the great amount of uncertainty involved in evaluating these players makes this an interesting case. The difference of only 3.3 between trade values is too small to be beyond measurement error and implies only that this appears to be an even trade.

CONCLUSION: EVEN TRADE. NEED FURTHER STUDY.