
+-- Thomas Hinshaw
| 1775-1824
+-- Benjamin J. Hinshaw --+
| 1795-1860 |
| +-- Lucy Clanton
| 1773-1859
Hugh Baker Hinshaw -----+
B: 1834 | +-- Isaac Carter
D: 1914 | |
+-- Ruth Carter ----------+
1792-1882 |
+-- Mary "Polly" Bray
M: Martha C. Lumpkin
+-- Ruth Elizabeth Hinshaw, 1857-1887
+-- Cornelia G. Hinshaw, 1859-1872
+-- Amanda Hinshaw, 1861-1944
+-- George B. Hinshaw, c1863-1875
+-- Martha Hinshaw, c1865-?
M: Martha Jenette
+-- William Pettis Hinshaw, 1868-1927
M: Theressa Flomerfelt
+-- Alice Hinshaw, 1856-?
+-- Arthur Grant Hinshaw, 1873-?
M: Maria E. Munger
M: Mrs. Mary E. Stevens
M: Mollie E. -
| Hugh Baker Hinshaw     [ID 01054] | Click here to switch to Ahnentafel view: ![]() |
Born Jun 14 1834, Surry County, North Carolina.42,44,146,a,b    (Oct - 1833).c
He married Martha C. Lumpkin, Feb 8 1857, Floyd County, Georgia.78,d,e,f    (Martha J. Lumpkin)g    (Martha Hickland)146    (Martha Jane -)h    Martha, daughter of George Lumpkin & Abagail Lucinda Cleghorn, was born Mar 5 1833, Newton County, Georgia.i,j,k,78,d,e    (George Lumpkin & Mary "Polly" Witcher).l
Hugh and Martha moved to California by the overland route.146
Hugh and family were shown in the 1860 census (Jun 10 1860), Tomales, Marin County, California, living in the household of a J.F.S. White:k
He then married Martha Jenette.h    Martha was born Mar 22 1842.h,j
Martha died Nov 30 1868, buried Macedonia Methodist Episcopal Church (South) Cemetery, Gravenstein Highway Souty, Sebastapol, Sonoma County, California.h,j
He then married Theressa Flomerfelt, 1870.m    (Teresa Flomerfelt)n,i    Theressa was born Jun - 1833, Ohio.n,o,p,q    (Jun 3 1834).i    Teresa had apparently been previously married, by whom she had a daughter, Alice, who took the name Alice Hinshaw.o
Hugh and family were shown in the 1870 census (Aug 3 1870), Tomales, Marin County, California:n
H.B. HINSHAW to W.P. HINSHAW, 85 acres Bodega township, $1000.
Hugh and Teresa were apparently divorced.    Teresa was shown living independently in the 1880 census (Jun 28 1880), Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California:o
He then married Maria E. Munger, Mar 12 1879, San Jose, Santa Clara County, California.t,u
Hugh was shown in the 1880 census (Jun 12 1880), living alone (without Maria) in Paicines Township, San Benito County, California:v
H.B. Henshaw, of Paicines, passed through town Tuesday on his way to Mendocino county.    He will be absent some time.
On May 20 1887, "The Hollister Free Lance" (Hollister, San Benito County, California) reported:x
Nellie K. Henshaw vs. H.B. Henshaw, Decree of divorce granted.
On Jul 1 1887, "The Hollister Free Lance" (Hollister, San Benito County, California) reported:y
On Jul 8 1887, "The Hollister Free Lance" again reported:y
People vs. B. Henshaw, for threats against J.H. Sorderegger, set for July 5th.
In Justice Lee's Justice Court on last Tuesday, H.B. Henshaw was examined on a charge of threatening to kill J.H Sanderegger, but was discharged on insufficient evidence.
He then married Mrs. Mary E. Stevens, Aug 22 1895.z    Mary was born about 1850, Illinois.z    At the time of this marriage, Hugh was recorded as a resident of Hollister; Mary was a native of Illinois and a resident of Cloverdale.z
Mary died before Jul 17 1900.c
Hugh and son William were shown in the 1900 census (Jul 17-18 1900), living in the household of brother William in Bloomfield Township, Sonoma County, California:c
Hugh and Mollie were shown in the 1910 census (Apr 22 1910), French Camp Road, Castoria Township, San Joaquin County, California:aa
The following article appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle on May 4, 1915 (page 1, column 4):ab
HINSHAW'S WIDOW GIVEN HIS ESTATE
Contestants fail to prove that Marriage to Deceased was Bigamous Special dispatch to the Chronicle.Stockton, May 3. - The right of Mollie E. Hinshaw to the estate of Hugh B. Hinshaw as the surviving widow was sustained by the Superior Court here this afternoon.    Mrs. Hinshaw's rights had been questioned by Amanda H. McReynolds, William P. Hinshaw and Arthur Hinshaw, children by a former wife, on the sensational ground that she was not the lawful widow of the deceased.    Some of the testimony introduces tended to show that Hugh B. Hinshaw had been married five times and that several of the marriages were bigamous.    The gist of the Court's decision which is one of the longest ever handed down in this county - is that if Mrs. Hinshaw is not he surviving widow of the deceased the petitioners failed to prove it and that she is entitled to the legal presumption to the contrary."
42. A manuscript titled "The Hinshaw Family" by Thomas D. Hamm - submitted by Fontella Hinshaw.
44. The Church Of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints (LDS) International Genealogical Index (IGI) - North Carolina.
78. The Church Of Jesus Christ of the Latter Day Saints (LDS) computerized Ancestral File.
146. "The Valley of the Trail Between the Two Rocks in Its Younger Days, and Mine", manuscript by Margaret Martin Paull. Contributed by Richard Burton and John Burton.
(a) 1850 census, South Division, Surry County, North Carolina; roll 646, page 227, dwelling #962, family #966.
(b) 1870 census, Butte County, California.
(c) 1900 census, Bloomfield Township, Sonoma County, California; roll T623-114, ED 155, page 23A, line #34, dwelling #499, family #507.
(d) RootsWeb WorldConnect data submitted by Lance Hall ().
(e) RootsWeb WorldConnect data submitted by David Scott ().
(f) Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, 1641-1944 Marriage Index; http://www.genealogy.com.
(g) Georgia Marriages, 1699-1944; http://www.ancestry.com.
(h) Contribution from Richard Burton citing:
"Cemetery Records from Sonoma County, CA, 1846-1921", Sonoma County
Genealogical Society (R.979.41 MERRITT).
(i) "Cemetery Records from Sonoma County, CA, 1846-1921", Sonoma County
Genealogical Society (R.979.41 MERRITT).
(j) http://www.findagrave.com.
(k) 1860 census, Tomales P.O., Tomales Township, Marin County, California; page 719, line #35, dwelling #132, family #128.
(l) RootsWeb WorldConnect data submitted by Leslie Williams ().
(m) "San Francisco Call 1875-1884 Births, Marriages and Deaths"
The San Francisco Call archives: http://feefhs.org/fdb2/sfcalli.html.
(n) 1870 census, Tomales P.O., Tomales Township, Marin County, California; page 85, line #22, dwelling #168, family #164.
(o) 1880 census, Sebastopol, Sonoma County, California; ED 133, page 275D, line #12, dwelling #333, family #347.
(p) 1900 census, Analy Township, Sonoma County, California; roll T623-114, ED 156, page 3B, line #87, dwelling #73, family #74.
(q) 1910 census, 1st Ward, Sebastopol, Analy Township, Sonoma County, California; roll T624-109, ED 138, page 81A, line #28, dwelling #106, family #106.
(r) Posting Nov 30 1999 in NEWSPAPER-ABSTRACTS-L.
(s) VitalSearch California Death Index 1905-1929:
http://www.vitalsearch-ca.com/gen/ca/_vitals/cadeathm.htm.
(t) Santa Clara County, California, Marriage License Index; from the San Jose
Historical Museum; LDS microfilm #1420231.
(u) Santa Clara County, California, Marriage Record Index, Book B: 1873-1883;
from Santa Clara County Courthouse; Book E, page 517; LDS microfilm #1302021, Item 5.
(v) 1880 census, Paicines Township, San Benito County, California; roll T9-0072, ED 62, page 421A, line #10, dwelling #71, family #71.
(w) Posting Apr 21 2003 by Dee () to NORCAL-L.
(x) Posting Jan 25 2002 by Dee () to NEWSPAPER-ABSTRACTS-L.
(y) Posting Feb 7 2002 by Dee () to NEWSPAPER-ABSTRACTS-L.
(z) Contribution from Richard Burton and John Burton citing:
Sonoma County, California, marriage license records.
(aa) 1910 census, Castoria Township, San Joaquin County, California; roll T624-102, ED 113, page 3B, line #54, dwelling #46, family #46.
(ab) Contribution from Richard Burton.
If you have additional information on this person, please share!
If you would like to be automatically notified by email
whenever an update
is made affecting this page then enter your email address
and click the "Enter" button below:
How is this person related to other ancestors?
To find out, enter the database ID number of another ancestor,
and then click the "Enter" button below:
This site uses spambot thwarting technology to hide email addresses from all known email harvesting programs used by spammers.
[This page was computer generated]