Strike Up the Accordion! It's Party Time in Chicago!
18 June, 1996
The Bulls were the oldest team in the NBA in '96, averaging
over 30 years of age and featuring four starters who have been in the
league for at least nine years.
Unlike the Slowtime Lakers that won in the late 80's and the already old
Pistons that dethroned them, however, this championship Chicago team really
showed few signs of age, being
perhaps the most physically fit team in the league. Yes, some
minor back problems troubled a few prominent Bulls and
Ron Harper's knee hurt, but there was little to support the Seattle
claim that the Bulls could not play a 48 minute game: the Bulls
never once struggled to hold on to a lead in the Finals and generally
outscored the Sonics in the second half. So the Bulls lost two games in the Finals --
as good as Chicago was, the numbers said they should lose two
games to Seattle, a legitimately great team that had the best
regular season record since the '92 Bulls.
Add all these things to Chicago's record-breaking regular season and the
fact that Chicago played the most agressive man-defense
in the league -- it is hard to see how the Bulls could be considered
old.
There were several important factors involved in the Bulls'
success this season, some of which are reproducible by any
team, many of which are not:
- Experience. The Bulls were not only the
oldest team in the league, but also the most experienced, averaging
over nine years per player. Being in the league that long means
you're either a great all-around player or you have a unique
talent that is NBA quality. The Bulls had some of both. Jordan,
Pippen, and Kukoc can all do a lot of things. Rodman and Kerr
are two of the greatest role-players in the NBA. Longley,
Wennington, and the rest of the goon crew provide strength
and size to body up to the centers of the league, which
doesn't take a lot of talent, but is a unique characteristic.
Ron Harper survived in the league through erratically good
offense, but added solid defense this season.
- Big and Tall. The Bulls were also the heaviest
team in the league and the second tallest. Basically,
facing the Bulls meant facing Superman in looser shorts. It did surprise
me that the media didn't play up the Bulls' height advantage
more in the Finals. The Bulls were taller than the league
average at every starting position except for power forward,
where Dennis Rodman's height certainly did not limit him.
When the Lakers were winning in the '80's, a lot of credit
was given to their height and to their ability to match
up with anyone. The Bulls could easily do the same.
- An offense of multiple threats and one Michael Jordan.
I once did a study of the
best offenses and there was very little similarity
between them other than the fact that they had numerous players
that could score. It didn't seem to matter if they were
centers, forwards, or guards, just that they could all be
threats. Since then, I've found mathematical reasons for
this, something I plan to write up this summer. What it
boils down to is this: each individual offensive threat
helps every other player on the floor score by weakening
the defense on the others and the more individual threats
there are, the more straight man defense (no help) has to be played,
which is what each individual is so good at beating.
For the Bulls, they had tremendous individual offensive
threats in Jordan, Kukoc, Kerr, and, well, Pippen. (Pippen
really is and always has been just better than average
offensively.) No one could confidently leave these guys
open for very long. No one could even cover Jordan with
one man or, sometimes, two men. With Jordan always drawing a
crowd, the rest of the Bulls knew how to finish. One of
my big projects this summer is to show how strong this
Jordan effect is.
- Being great offensively and having a good bench
can make a great defense... or is it the other way around?
There is too much interest in cause and effect in life.
The Bulls are a prime example of how being good at a number
of things just magnifies how good they are. Regardless of
whether the driving force was the offense or the defense,
by having a good offense/defense, it made the other better.
The Bulls had to face themselves in practice. They had
to learn how to stop themselves or score against themselves.
By being that good, it made them better. A critical
aspect of this was that they had a deep bench that integrated
with the first team to a large degree. Without that,
the practice first team would be facing an inferior second
team and not improving. But the fact that the Bulls second
team could score made the first team work harder. It also
earned that second team time in the games, which meant they
got time on the first team in practice, which meant they
had to play like first team players. That is a complicated
way of saying that the Bulls were more than the sum of their
individuals. They built upon the presence of one another
to be an awesome team, something that should
not be lost on the young coaches and players of the world.
- Dennis Rodman and the Technicolor Dream 'Do.
After just having said how Chicago was more than the
sum of its individuals, I have to say that Dennis Rodman
is one of the most unique talents this league has ever
seen. It is very difficult to
estimate his value due to his unique style, but one
thing is for certain: he is extreme. By being that
extreme, he helped stall the San Antonio push for a title, but by
being that extreme, it also helped turn a great Bulls team into an
unforgettable one.
At the start of next season, it will be interesting to see how
many of the above factors remain intact. It is hard to
see the personnel changing significantly, with the possible
exception of Rodman. Regardless of what happens, it is
unlikely that the team can repeat or outdo what they did
this season. Age eventually took down the Lakers, the
Celtics, and the Pistons -- it will get the Bulls, too.
Maybe age will only slow Chicago down next season, but life
wouldn't be fair if it just ignored them..... We shouldn't
be so naive.
© 1996, L. Dean Oliver